<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FatWallet Now! Testing Summary</title>
	<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/</link>
	<description>Resources For Fair Practices In Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tim Storm</title>
		<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/#comment-50</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/#comment-50</guid>
					<description>Hi Kellie -

Thanks for sharing the information and for the research!

Our attitude is that we shouldn't get paid a commission unless we add value to the transaction... this is why we don't do the cookie stuffing, auto redirection, etc...

Let us know if you have any questions!

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kellie -</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the information and for the research!</p>
<p>Our attitude is that we shouldn&#8217;t get paid a commission unless we add value to the transaction&#8230; this is why we don&#8217;t do the cookie stuffing, auto redirection, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Let us know if you have any questions!</p>
<p>Tim
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kellie AFP</title>
		<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Is it possible that forced clicks could be added down the road? Yes, but then anything is possible. Of course any affiliate can engage in bad behavior. Possible doesn't mean probable however.  Possible is why I test on an on going basis. Probable is how I prioritize my testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that forced clicks could be added down the road? Yes, but then anything is possible. Of course any affiliate can engage in bad behavior. Possible doesn&#8217;t mean probable however.  Possible is why I test on an on going basis. Probable is how I prioritize my testing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/08/26/fatwallet-now-testing-summary/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>It do look clean now, but they will prob add script to load cookie soon enough, or maybe they check for criteria now, and force cookie for some user.
It is not different then other webs that start with clean toolbars and turn crooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It do look clean now, but they will prob add script to load cookie soon enough, or maybe they check for criteria now, and force cookie for some user.<br />
It is not different then other webs that start with clean toolbars and turn crooked.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

